Layering Lab

Wear two at once

Pick two fragrances. See what each brings, how the blend leans, and whether people who tried the pair say it works.

Per SeFirst · 27 87Per SeEDP · 2023 · ★ 3.73
#HashtagSecond · 27 87#HashtagEDP · 2016 · ★ 3.64
From your collection:Save fragrances to pick from them here
Per Se#Hashtag
Harmony pairing

Per Se × #Hashtag

Aldehydic, musky and powdery meets aldehydic, woody and amber. They share eight accords and two notes.

Find samples of both
The blend

How the pair leans

Each bar adds the two accord profiles, assuming one spray of each. Gold is Per Se, blue is #Hashtag. It's arithmetic on the data, not a test on skin.

Per Se#Hashtag
aldehydicboth
muskyboth
powderyboth
freshboth
woodyboth
irisboth
ozonicboth
aquaticboth
ambersecond
floralfirst
What each brings

Notes apart, notes in common

Only in Per Se
Violet LeavesViolet LeavesBlack and Pink PepperBlack and Pink PepperOrrisOrrisBambooBambooFloral NotesFloral NotesAngelica RootAngelica RootAmbretteAmbrette
In both
AldehydesMusk
Eight shared accords:
aldehydicmuskypowderyfreshirisozonicwoodyaquatic
Only in #Hashtag
Violet LeafViolet LeafOlibanumOlibanumIrisIrisCedarCedar
Why it might work
  • Notes in commonBoth list aldehydes and musk, so the two have a shared base to meet on.
  • A shared threadAldehydic, musky, powdery and fresh run through both.
  • Same seasonBoth are voted best for spring.
  • Evenly matchedPerformance votes are close: Per Se is moderate on both, #Hashtag moderate on both, so neither should bury the other.
Suggested from the two fragrances' accords, notes and votes. Not yet tested by wearers.
A starting point#Hashtag first, then Per Se over it, one spray each.The deeper one goes on first so the lighter one sits on top. Adjust to taste.
Has anyone tried it?

Be the first to say

No votes on this pair yet. Once 25 people have voted, their verdict leads this page and our suggestion steps back.

Sign in to vote
0 / 25 VOTES
Per Se × #Hashtag · Layering Lab | Scentsation