Layering Lab
Wear two at once
Pick two fragrances. See what each brings, how the blend leans, and whether people who tried the pair say it works.
First · 27 87Per SeEDP · 2023 · ★ 3.73
Second · 27 87#HashtagEDP · 2016 · ★ 3.64From your collection:Save fragrances to pick from them here


Harmony pairing
Per Se × #Hashtag
Aldehydic, musky and powdery meets aldehydic, woody and amber. They share eight accords and two notes.
The blend
How the pair leans
Each bar adds the two accord profiles, assuming one spray of each. Gold is Per Se, blue is #Hashtag. It's arithmetic on the data, not a test on skin.
Per Se#Hashtag
aldehydicboth
muskyboth
powderyboth
freshboth
woodyboth
irisboth
ozonicboth
aquaticboth
ambersecond
floralfirst
What each brings
Notes apart, notes in common
Only in Per Se
Violet Leaves
Black and Pink Pepper
Orris
Bamboo
Floral Notes
Angelica Root
Ambrette
Violet Leaves
Black and Pink Pepper
Orris
Bamboo
Floral Notes
Angelica Root
AmbretteIn both
AldehydesMusk
Eight shared accords:aldehydicmuskypowderyfreshirisozonicwoodyaquatic
Only in #Hashtag
Violet Leaf
Olibanum
Iris
Cedar
Violet Leaf
Olibanum
Iris
CedarWhy it might work
- Notes in commonBoth list aldehydes and musk, so the two have a shared base to meet on.
- A shared threadAldehydic, musky, powdery and fresh run through both.
- Same seasonBoth are voted best for spring.
- Evenly matchedPerformance votes are close: Per Se is moderate on both, #Hashtag moderate on both, so neither should bury the other.
A starting point#Hashtag first, then Per Se over it, one spray each.The deeper one goes on first so the lighter one sits on top. Adjust to taste.
Has anyone tried it?
Be the first to say
No votes on this pair yet. Once 25 people have voted, their verdict leads this page and our suggestion steps back.
Sign in to vote
0 / 25 VOTES
Try before you buy
Sample both
More partners
Suggested from accords and notes · look-alikes left out

